منابع مشابه
Peer Reviewers and Book Reviewers for 2015
Abbott, Haxby Agnew, Jennifer Aiken, Alice Andrioli, Angie Arya, Neil Bainbridge, Lesley Bath, Brenna Bayley, Mark Bishop, Annette Blackstock, Felicity Boe, Shaun Brunton, Laura Butcher, Scott Camden, Chantal Camp, Pat Carvajal, Jennifer Chan, Zachary Cheifetz, Oren Chung, Frank Cleaver, Shaun Collins, Jennifer Cott, Cheryl Dean, Elizabeth Debigaré, Richard Desveaux, Laura Dickerson, Clark Dick...
متن کاملGuidelines for Identifying Empirically Supported Treatments Practical Recommendations for Clinical Researchers and Reviewers
Recently, the Society of Clinical Psychology (SCP) updated its criteria for empirically supported treatments (ESTs). Whereas the original criteria (Chambless & Hollon, 1998; Chambless & Ollendick, 2001; Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures, 1993) identified a psychological treatment as “wellestablished” when it was supported by at least two independently conduct...
متن کاملEthical Guidelines for Internal Audit Reporting Lines
The present study identifies ethical ways of auditing reporting, which define the relationship between internal audit and the various authorities of the organization. Defining these lines as determinants of impartiality and independence of internal audit is of great importance. In this research, the structural equation model has been used to test the proposed model. The information required for...
متن کاملGuidelines for Authors and Reviewers of IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Elements
This document provides guidelines for how to write definitions of new Information Elements for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) protocol. It provides instructions on using the proper conventions for Information Elements to be registered in the IANA IPFIX Information Element registry, and provides guidelines for expert reviewers to evaluate new registrations. Information about the current ...
متن کاملInstructions for Reviewers
Each reviewer is expected to immediately download the papers, to read and understand them in their entirety, and to provide high quality reviews. The submitted reviews should be of adequate length and include sufficient details about the paper; in no cases should reports give to submitting authors the impression of lack of care and depth of analysis. High quality reviews will satisfy, for examp...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of the American College of Cardiology
سال: 1993
ISSN: 0735-1097
DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90075-c